Subject: Re: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval

From: Behcet Sarikaya <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:01:29 -0800 (PST)

I agree that ipv6 over ipv6cs document is ready to become an RFC.
Ohe other issues however, probably, it takes a draft. Then we can see if there is really a problem there or not.

Regards,

Behcet

----- Original Message ----
From: Jari Arkko <[email-masked]>
To: Behcet Sarikaya <[email-masked]>
Cc: "Premec, Domagoj" <[email-masked]>; Junghoon Jee <[email-masked]>; [email-masked]
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 12:16:15 PM
Subject: Re: [16NG] ipv6 over ipv6cs document approval

Domagoj, Syam, etc have already explained how this
works. There's really no issue.

It is true that RA intervals are something watch for; that's
why the document allowed raising them.

(In addition, at upper layers, one might consider firewall
policies regarding packets from the Internet to the hosts.)

Jari

_______________________________________________
16NG mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/16ng