Subject: [6lowpan] draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-05

From: JP Vasseur <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 10:20:36 +0200

Quick comment: I think that you agreed to add some text clarifying  
what has changed compared to RFC4944. This might be good since I  
recently saw some misinterpretations and I am afraid of seeing more  
and more people confused between the two.

On another front, Geoff, Carsten, what do you want to do with RFC4944?  
Update, Bis, ... ?

Thanks.

JP.