Subject: Re: [alto] ***SPAM*** 5.418 (5) Is it possible to incorporate "server notification" mechanism into current ALTO protocol

From: Reinaldo Penno <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:20:24 -0400

Interesting. I certainly see value in such mechanism for Tracker/CDN based
networks. Given the developments in HTTPby you might not even need a new
connection for such deployments.

Thanks,

Reinaldo

On 4/16/10 8:56 AM, "wangaijun" <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Hi Alimi,
> 
> We have discussed about our
> draft(http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-sun-alto-notification-00.txt) for short
> time in IETF meeting in Anaheim. It a pity we did not get the chance to
> illustrate the prepared ppt(see attached file)in this meeting.
> 
> After this meeting, I discussed your comments with my colleagues, and we
> still think the "server notification" mechanism should be incorporated into
> the current ALTO protocol. It may act as one optional implementation, and
> mainly aim at the tracker-based environment. For tracker-less application,
> if one PID head was elected as described in draft
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ikpark-alto-virtual-p2ptracker-00.txt,
> the notification mechanism can also applied to it, on the assumption that it
> has the public IP address. These implementation can certainly reduce the
> burden of the ALTO server and let the ALTO clients get the ALTO information
> timely. This eventually will let the p2p traffic to keep up with the
> adjustment pace of ISP's policy.
> 
> Wait for you and other interested persons' comments. If possible, we can
> discuss it in the coming " Interim Virtual Meeting " or next IETF plenary
> meeting.
> 
> Best regards.
> 
> 
> Wang Aijun
> Network Infrastructure Research Division
> Network and Service Research Department
> China Telecom Coporation Beijing Research Institute
>  
> 
> ============================================================================
> ========
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Interim Virtual Meeting (Enrico Marocco)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:36:11 +0200
> From: Enrico Marocco <[email-masked]>
> Subject: [alto] Interim Virtual Meeting
> To: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
> Cc: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <[email-masked]>
> Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> as mentioned during the last meeting, we plan to have an interim WebEx
> meeting between Anaheim and Maastricht. The date we have identified is June
> 16, but it may still be subject to change.
> 
> In particular, we would like to focus the meeting on progressing the work on
> the protocol document, info redistribution, deployment considerations and
> v4/v6 issues. If anyone would like to propose other topics, please check
> well in advance with the chairs.
> 
> An official email from the IETF secretariat will follow in the following
> weeks.
> 
> --
> Ciao,
> Enrico
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: smime.p7s
> Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
> Size: 5162 bytes
> Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
> Url :
> <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto/attachments/20100415/18b44c56/att
> achment.bin>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
> 
> 
> End of alto Digest, Vol 18, Issue 6
> ***********************************
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto