Subject: Re: [alto] ALTO cost-ids & lookup tables

From: Wendy Roome <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 09:22:19 -0400

My mistake! In early drafts, cost-type & cost-mode were optional
parameters, with defaults of "routingcost" and "numerical". I hadn't
noticed that later drafts changed them to be required parameters.

	- Wendy Roome 

>Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:52:52 -0700
>From: Richard Alimi <[email-masked]>
>Subject: Re: [alto] ALTO cost-ids & lookup tables
>
>On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Wendy Roome
><[email-masked]>wrote:
>
>......
>
>>But if we don't use cost-id names in filtered map requests, and the
>>client
>>has to spell-out the full cost-id, then we should define what happens if
>>the client omits the mode or type.
>>
>
>Currently in the Filtered Cost Map request, we state that cost mode and
>cost type are required fields.  What would be the motivating factors
>behind
>making them optional?