Subject: Re: [Dhcpv6bis] [dhcpv6bis] #18 (XML 3315): ORO - mandatory?

From: "dhcpv6bis issue tracker" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 12:46:48 -0000

#18: ORO - mandatory?

Changes (by [email-masked]):

 * owner:  [email-masked] => [email-masked]

Comment:

 Reassigned to Ted. See related ticket on ORO - #81.

-- 
------------------------------+------------------------------------
 Reporter:  [email-masked]    |       Owner:  [email-masked]
     Type:  editorial-change  |      Status:  new
 Priority:  P4 minor          |   Milestone:  C awaiting consensus
Component:  XML 3315          |  Resolution:
 Keywords:                    |    Due Date:
------------------------------+------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/dhcpv6bis/ticket/18#comment:6>
dhcpv6bis <http://tools.ietf.org/group/dhcpv6bis/>