Subject: Re: [Dots] DOTS at IETF111 draft minutes

From: "Valery Smyslov" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 16:08:56 +0300

Hi Jon,

fixed all, except for (see below):

> Hi Frank and Valery,
> 
> Some comments on the minutes (for clarity)
> 
> DOTS Multihoming
> 
> s/Jon: there isn't too much there, just [list of topics], but yes/Jon: there
> isn't too much there to review, just guidance with a set of examples, but
> yes, this may trigger some more reviews/
> 
> DOTS Q-Block interop report
> 
> s/what (CoAP) method to use for requesting missing blocks - using PUT
> triggered a full response, but should not have./What (CoAP) method to use
> for requesting missing response blocks - e.g. using PUT triggered a full
> response, but should use PUT to request missing  response blocks./
> 
> s/Clarify that GET (NUM==0, Mbit=1) should be treated as a request for the
> entire body./Clarified that GET (NUM==0, Mbit=1) should be treated only as a
> request for the entire body./
> 
> s/ implementation/ implementation/

Sorry, I didn't get what to change here. Can you please clarify?

> s/ telemetry document to talk about it/ telemetry document to encourage its
> use/

Regards,
Valery.

> Regards
> 
> Jon
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Valery Smyslov [mailto: [email-masked]]
> > Sent: 30 July 2021 22:06
> > To: [email-masked]
> > Cc: [email-masked]
> > Subject: [Dots] DOTS at IETF111 draft minutes
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > draft minutes for IETF 111 are uploaded to the datatracker:
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/materials/minutes-111-dots-02
> >
> > Many thanks to Ben for taking them.
> > Please review and send corrections to chairs.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Frank & Valery.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dots mailing list
> > [email-masked]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots