Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-10

From: Lars Eggert <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 16:38:48 +0200

Ines, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document.

Lars

> On 2021-11-29, at 22:42, Ines Robles via Datatracker <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-10
> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review Date: 2021-11-29
> IETF LC End Date: 2021-11-29
> IESG Telechat date: 2022-01-06
> 
> Summary:
> 
> The document describes a scheme that allows an HTTP client to communicate its
> preferences for how the upstream server prioritizes responses to its requests,
> and also allows a server to hint to a downstream intermediary how its responses
> should be prioritized when they are forwarded.
> 
> The document does not present major issues, just one minor nit.
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> Page 6: "Multiple experiments from independent research have shown" --> please
> add references to this claim
> 
> Thank you for this document,
> 
> Ines.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art