Subject: Re: [Jose-reg-review] Request to register header parameter: svt

From: Stefan Santesson <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 00:54:01 +0100

Hi,

Sorry I missed this reply.

I would be happy to add my contact details as specified in the drafts:

Stefan Santesson
IDsec Solutions AB
Forskningsbyn Ideon
SE-223 70 Lund
Sweden

Email: [email-masked]

How do we proceed with this?

/Stefan

Den 2021-10-18 kl. 17:28, skrev Sean Turner:
> H!
>
> My one question about this registration is whether the IESG should be the change controller. It says the following in RFC 7515:
>
>   Change Controller:
>       For Standards Track RFCs, list the "IESG".  For others, give the
>       name of the responsible party.  Other details (e.g., postal
>       address, email address, home page URI) may also be included.
>
> All previous registrations have been through a standards track RFC, but this one isn’t. Maybe just list Stefan or IDsec’s info?
>
> spt
>
>> On Sep 3, 2021, at 11:32, Stefan Santesson <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-santesson-svt-jws/ is
>> being requested for publication as individual submission
>>
>> This draft includes the request to register the JWS Header Parameter 
>> "svt" as follows:
>>
>> 6.1.  Header Parameter Names Registration
>>
>>    This section registers the "svt" Header Parameter in the IANA "JSON
>>    Web Signature and Encryption Header Parameters" registry established
>>    by [RFC7515].
>>
>> 6.1.1.  Registry Contents
>>
>>    *  Header Parameter Name: "svt"
>>    *  Header Parameter Description: Signature Validation Token
>>    *  Header Parameter Usage Location(s): JWS
>>    *  Change Controller: IESG
>>    *  Specification Document(s): Section 3.1 of {this document}
>>
>>
>> The draft specifies a a profile for including SVT tokens in a JWS using
>> this defined header parameter ("svt").
>>
>> The rationale for this claim is described in the referenced document and
>> the main specification found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-santesson-svt/ .
>>
>> The solution is deployed is real services and it is considered for
>> national government usage which is the main reason to publish the
>> specification as an informational RFC.
>>
>>
>> /Stefan Santesson
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jose-reg-review mailing list
>> [email-masked]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose-reg-review