From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:49:11 -0500 (CDT)

mail4.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600);
	 Tue, 8 Oct 2002 12:27:16 -0700
Received: from 157.54.6.197 by inet-vrs-04.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (InterScan E-Mail
VirusWall NT); Tue, 08 Oct 2002 12:27:07 -0700
Received: from red-imc-01.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.9.102]) by
inet-hub-06.redmond.corp.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600);
	 Tue, 8 Oct 2002 12:27:16 -0700
Received: from WIN-IMC-02.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.0.84]) by
red-imc-01.redmond.corp.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600);
	 Tue, 8 Oct 2002 12:27:15 -0700
Received: from WIN-MSG-04.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.2.38]) by
WIN-IMC-02.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3663.0);
	 Tue, 8 Oct 2002 12:27:12 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6771.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Subject: RE: A new version of IAKERB
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 12:27:15 -0700
Message-ID:
<[email-masked]>
From: "Bernard Aboba" <[email-masked]>
To: "Douglas E. Engert" <[email-masked]>, <[email-masked]>,
        <[email-masked]>, <[email-masked]>,
        "Jonathan Trostle" <[email-masked]>,
        "Kerberos WG" <[email-masked]>
Sender: [email-masked]

On the IESG status list (http://www.ietf.org/IESG/status.html), the
token for IAKERB is listed as being with Jeff Schiller since February
26, 2002. 
The -08 draft has since expired, so we refreshed it without changes.

-----Original Message-----
From: Douglas E. Engert [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 6:22 AM
To: [email-masked]; [email-masked]; Bernard Aboba;
[email-masked]; Jonathan Trostle; Kerberos WG
Subject: A new version of IAKERB

The IETF has issued a new version of IAKERB,
<draft-ietf-cat-iakerb-09.txt>
But we had gone to WG last call, and this was submitted to the IESG. One
complaint had been received, and Jonathan Trestle had been drafting a
response to the complaint. 

Jonathan, 
 What happened to the response? 

Is the fact that a new draft has appeared mean that you or one of the
other
 authors found a problem? 

Can you tell the list what going on?

Is this just an update to the date on the draft?

-- 

 Douglas E. Engert  <[email-masked]>
 Argonne National Laboratory
 9700 South Cass Avenue
 Argonne, Illinois  60439 
 (630) 252-5444