From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:26:13 -0600 (CST)

using -f
To: Tom Yu <[email-masked]>
Cc: Matt Crawford <[email-masked]>, [email-masked]
Subject: Re: comments on draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-clarifications-02.txt
From: assar <[email-masked]>
Date: 19 Nov 2002 16:04:18 -0500
Lines: 10
Sender: [email-masked]

Tom Yu <[email-masked]> writes:
> We should consider X.680:1997 and X.690:1997 to be normative
> references.  A responsible implementor should read the normative
> references to arrive at a correct implementation.  I believe that both
> of these references are already listed in the document.

And what's the problem with saying that they define MAX?

Since the ISO documents explain ASN.1 fully, why is there any need for
any ASN.1-related discussion at all in the document?