Subject: Re: INTEGER

From: Simon Josefsson <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 01:57:58 +0100

This is a reminder of the issue with unconstrained INTEGER in the
ASN.1 schema in clarifications.  See:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.krb-wg/1368

Thanks,
Simon

From: Simon Josefsson <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: INTEGER
Newsgroups: gmane.ietf.krb-wg
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 19:36:26 +0200

Could these two INTEGER be replaced by Int32 and UInt32, respectively?
Then an implementation need not worry about bignum.

>    TYPED-DATA      ::= SEQUENCE SIZE (1..MAX) OF SEQUENCE {
>            data-type       [0] INTEGER,
>            data-value      [1] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL
>    }
>
>    AD-AND-OR               ::= SEQUENCE {
>            condition-count [0] INTEGER,
>            elements        [1] AuthorizationData
>    }