Subject: Doc Oz Episode Clip: Top Rated Ep (5/20)

From: Saddle Bags? <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 11:05:23 -0700

When You Look In The Mirror Do You Like What You See?

DocOz has the way to Transform Your Body in 4 Weeks
====================================================

- No Germy Gym
- No Starvation 

Just View the 1 and Only Step Necessary -> http://www.luckyacr.com/droz/episode/clip/view.video

This DocOz Episode is Changing the Way that Doctors think about -Loss.
People Are losing 1 lb a day, that means 20+ lbs in just 1 month.

-DocOz Show
Episode Recap 
http://www.luckyacr.com/droz/episode/clip/view.video

to modify message settings - Alert System Notifications
1107 Valeria Dr.|Marion|Texas|78124
http://www.luckyacr.com/knsgvo9.sj44

Two other options

Titanium Developer -  community edition - write in HTML/JavaScript - compile with Xcode (requires a Mac or VM)OpenPlus ELIPS Studio - write in Flex, compile on Xcode (requires a Mac or VM) - they just started charging for their product however.I think there may be 'toolchain' options for these and some of the others mentioned, which allow you to compile to binary on Windows, and I have seen that you can upload a zip file and have a toolchain style compile done for you online, but this goes against the Apple licensing.If I am not mistaken, a product such as Titanium that outputs/works with Xcode and does not use any 3rd party / alternative / restricted libraries should be in compliance, because you are ultimately compiling in xcode - normal Objective-C code and libraries.YOU CAN DEVELOP IPHONE APPS ON WINDOWS PC. I've done it, with complex apps. And it works perfectly. You can develop iphone apps without ever seeing a mac or iphone.You can develop on windows an HTML (or better: HTML5)
  app, using tools like Sencha or JQTouch, or mobi1. (They used to all be  for a while)Then you use openSSL to sign the app. And Adobe PhoneGAP Build service to build IPhone App.
But you need the iphone developer licence to install it on an iphone. But you don't need a mac or iphone at any minute to compile, build or test it - all that is done ON THE PCI've done it, and it works perfectly. (But with Android type responsiveness - not as fast as a native IPhone app)
@echo offsetlocal enableextensions enabledelayedexpansionif "x%1"=="x" (echo Usage: which goto :en:: First try the unadorned filenmame.set fullspec=call :find_it %:: Then try all adorned filenames in orderset my
:loop1:: Stop if found or out of extensions.if "xmypathext"=="x" goto :loop1en Get the next extension and try it
    for /f "delims=;" %%j in ("mypathext") do set myext=%%j
    call :find_it %1myext
You could also use a program from the the Babylonian era (circa 300 bc) running C and C++ called dragonfly. If your app has one or two screens with limited interactivity, and many calculations, go for it. It includes an emulator. You compile to the iphone at the press of a button. (Not sure, but I think you do need a developers license in any case)

And then there is Xamarin. You develop in C# with special calls to native code. You'll have to learn the environment.Foredecker: "which" searches the PATH for the executable that will be run if you type a command at the shell prompt.   Greg Hewgill Nov 20 '08 at 4:28
1	  	
for example, if you have 5 versions of Java installed and you don't know which one is being used you can type "which java" and it gives you the PATH to the binary   ninesided Nov 20 '08 at 4:41
38	  	
Why are folks modding up wrong answers? The equivalent to 'which' is 'where.exe'. Michael Ratanapintha was the first correct one.   Foredecker Nov 22 '08 at 5:05
4@Foredecker, MR says it's "where" in Win2k3 but Win2k3 wasn't part of the question. If "where" isn't in the other Windows versions, other answers are also valid. IMNSHO, the answer that works on all Windows versions is the best. Also, the other answers aren't wrong, just different ways of doing it.   paxdiablo Nov 22 '08 at 12:55
11	I know this question arose before SuperUser, but it probably belongs there.   palswim Oct 12 '10 at 17:04
You can a batch file having only 90 bytes from here:I found this batch file very hand   Etienne Sep 21 '11 at 20:58This was asked in other threads: [Equivalent of *Nix 'which' command in Powershell?][1] [Powershell equivalent to unix which command?][ superuser.com/   Anonymous Dec 13 '11 at 5:2Why is this closed as off topic??? The FAQ says appropriate questions can be about "software tools commonly used by programmers", like "which"?? I found this question while I was working on a cross platform programming project and couldn't figure out how to tell where a program was on Windows. Seems like a perfect question for Stack Overflow.   Jason Jun 11 '12 at 18:17This is very anoiing. Administrators sometimes close questions that may be just a bit off topic, but still very interesting. I think you administrators should leave such borderline-questions untouched   Argeman Jun 27 '12 at 15:2 This is not off-topic. . . . I looked this up while programming on a .NET project (usually I work on 
 OSX & Linux).   Jasper Blues Oct 4 '12 at 0:55  	
To those who wish to re-open the question, please note the "reopen" link underneath the question. You can vote to re-open (requires 3000 rep).   Roy Tinker Jul 1 '13 at 17:47	
I think this would be better fit for  Phillip Schmidt Jul 5 '13 at 17:51
How on earth is this an off topic question? +1000   gyozo kudor Sep 3 '13 at 16:26 
The way popular questions like this marked as off-topic shows that there's something wrong with the Stackoverflow policy..   pckben Nov 14 '13 at 0:53@JasperBlues: People also need to change their network settings while working on programming projects. Or download files using their browser. Just because it's a question a programmer had does not make it a programming question. This is not a programming question.   Ben Voigt Mar 25 at 19:41@BenVoigt Thanks for the clarification.   Jasper Blues Mar 25 at 22:29
Hey, I wish I had learned that Too bad it doesn't work with MS-DOS or Win9x (that is, with command.com). (Raymond Chen has a more "elaborate" version you can turn into a batch file: )   Michael Ratanapintha Jan 1 '09 at 3:27
3@Michael, if you're still using DOS or Win95, finding executables on the path are the least of your problems :-)   paxdiablo Apr 9 '09 at 5:41windows recognizes more than .exe as executable. Last time I coded a which back in W95/DOS days amdittedly, the search order was - current dir, then each path dir, for cmd.com, then cmd.exe, then cmd.bat So, even cmd.bat in current dir is executed befroe cmd.exe soemwhere in path   Mawg Mar 26 '10 at 0:46@mawg, the original was for where you know the extension since it mirrors which under UNIX (where that extension-adding trickery doesn't occur). I've now added one which can do what you wish but it's no longer a simple command so much as a script. It first tries the unadorned command then each of the extension ones. Hope that helps. You can tweak it to your needs as you see fit (if you want the same search order as with Windows for example - this one shows all possibilities).   paxdiablo Mar 26 '10 at 1:34looks like a emicon   qwertymk Jan 23 
 '12 at 2:2I needed a solution for Windows XP, and this did the trick. Thanks   Tom Pietrosanti Apr 10 '13 at 15:54To turn this into a batch script, create a file called "which.bat":  @echo off     for %%i in (%1) do @echo.  add it to an alias.bat script that you load everytime you run cmd.exe (put the above script in a new directory called C:\usr\aliases):  Then you can make a script to launch cmd.exe with the alias.bat fil
Discussion about topicality of questions belongs on Meta Stack Overflow. Alternatively, you can skip discussion altogether and simply flag or vote (depending on your rep level) for reopening.