Subject: Bitcoin is taking over a currency

From: "Mike Ward" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 13:46:57 -0600

You are receiving this email as a part of your subscription to a 3rd party email list.

Money Map Press and Money Morning do not own your subscription.

Dear [email-masked],

Have you seen this story?

36 cities in 20 states are turning their back on the US Dollar.

This is happening right here in America. It's extremely controversial. And it's a quickly developing situation.

Click here to learn more about this.

Sincerely,

Michael Robinson

Defence and Technology Specialist

If you wish to opt out of future advertising from Money Morning and Money Map Press you can Unsubscribe Here

The contents of this email were sent to you by a 3rd party vendor contracted by Money Map Press to send emails. Money Map Press and Money Morning do not own your subscription to their service. If you wish to be unsubscribed from this mail please reply to the group or individual that sent this to you.

Â© 2014 Money Map Press All Rights Reserved.

Nothing in this email should be considered personalized financial advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular financial situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized financial advice.

We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security recommended to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any recommendations in this letter should be made only after consulting with your financial adviser and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. This Newsletter may only be used pursuant to the subscription agreement and any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of: Money Map Press. 16 West Madison Street, Baltimore MD 21201.

Another very important event is that the political structure takes shape gradually, at first, they try their best to integrate the dotted-living people, and manage public
affairs, tackle with lawsuits or disputes. The word ÿÿÿ is just used to desc
ribe the effort of the Great Pontifex or Great Emperor to create order among citizens. But as time wears on, they are aware that the interference of the supreme governor on ma
ny fields is not beneficial at all. So a doctrine names as the rule of no i
nterference(ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ) comes to the fore, and somehow people starts using ÿÿÿ to indicate a chaotic situation, because most of the administration and management measures are dee
med as counter-productive. In the later usage of ÿÿÿ, people almost have for
gotten that it was to mean order and beauty.

Until now, all the examples show that words can changed from blight side to a dark side. Now let us see the opposite situation. ÿÿÿis originally to mean wage a war or fight
against someone or some other city, which is another vindication that lots
of words spring from political life. But they goes on to find that when at war with others , we are in the process of understanding them. So ÿÿÿ now gets new meanings which ar
e to learn, and to treat it in a reasonable way, to tease out. Another simi
lar example is ÿÿÿ, its ancient form depicts an image in which a man utilize his arm to catch a heavy object, so referring to military power.(ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ) But hundreds of years
later, it shows up in texts to mean measure up or weigh up, because they ar
e conscious that the power or strength used to fight can also be used to weigh up things, and that they need to do that now for the matter of exchange or other reasons. Since
then, ÿÿÿ can carry good meaning,ÿÿÿ is a very important wisdom of the ancien
t sophists.

Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
6th August 2013, 6:51 PM #12
BODYholic
BODYholic is online now Senior Member

Join Date
Aug 2008
Location
Singapore
Native language
Chinese Cantonese
Posts
1,478

Quote Originally Posted by Skatinginbc View Post
Yes, in ÿÿÿÿÿÿ, ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ. For instance, ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ
Thanks. It's good to hear that. At first, I thought only people from my country use it in such an odd way. In fact, I couldn't find any online dictionary that support this
definition. Okay, perhaps it's unorthodox.

Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
6th August 2013, 7:21 PM #13
xiaolijie's Avatar
xiaolijie
xiaolijie is offline MOD

Join Date
Oct 2007
Location
UK
Native language
English (UK)
Posts
3,386

Quote Originally Posted by BODYholic View Post
Thanks. It's good to hear that. At first, I thought only people from my country use it in such an odd way. In fact, I couldn't find any online dictionary that support this
definition. Okay, perhaps it's unorthodox.
When a word is ambiguous between a negative and a positive meaning, who'd be unwise enough to use it in the positive sense? ( it could be wrongly construed ). But yes, as
an entry in a dictionary, the positive sense of the character is recorded.
Offhand, I can think of Wenlin dictionary being one but there are no doubt others.

Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
6th August 2013, 8:51 PM #14
zhg
zhg is online now Senior Member

Join Date
Apr 2012
Native language
Chinese
Posts
198

Personally I don't think in a modern speech ÿÿÿ when stands alone by itself will be taken to mean "brilliant" which is almost always used combining other characters, which
is why I suspect they are inseparable, e.g. ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ don't make sense
.

Last edited by zhg; 6th August 2013 at 9:24 PM.

Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
6th August 2013, 9:13 PM #15
Skatinginbc's Avatar
Skatinginbc
Skatinginbc is offline Senior Member

Join Date
Jan 2013
Location
Canada
Native language
Mandarin ÿÿÿÿÿÿ
Posts
424

Quote Originally Posted by Ben pan View Post
So there is no transformation of meaning in the usage
I just want to confirm if I get you right: Are you saying that there is no semantic change but semantic expansion? If so, I totally agree with you. ÿÿÿ and some English wor
ds we have discussed still keep their original meanings except that the lin
guistic environments for the older meanings have become restricted (e.g., ÿÿÿ "brilliant" rarely stands alone). Of course, the newest meanings (e.g., sick "cool", ÿÿÿ "ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿ") as still in their early stage of development are often confined to sl
ang or informal usage.

Reply With Quote Reply With Quote