Subject: The most loved episode by viewers is back

From: Good-Housekeeping <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 06:49:58 -0700

Good Housekeeping | Since 1885 (Digital Delivery)

We teamed up with Doc.Oz uncover what most think is unbelievable.

We followed four moms while we put Oz's "Rapid-Belly-Melt" to the test. What did we learn from this? Actually, we could not believe our eyes. Oz has been spot on with this trick.

Learn his idea here: http://www.fiepath.com/facets/neurosis/sporulate/scottish/quadroons/reinduce.htm

And lean what Rachael Ray has to say about this. (her pics now posted)

[Woman | Beauty | Style | Holidays | Home ]
-------------------------------------------------
If you're not into working out
this is right up your ally http://www.fiepath.com/facets/neurosis/sporulate/scottish/quadroons/reinduce.htm

From: GH-Partners 2024 <> 11997 J Ave
Fayette <> IA-52142 <> If you are unsatisfied you can alter your mail subs at any time by writing or alternatively going to http://www.fiepath.com/bagmen/evacuation/rhymesters.html -- 

=======++=======
Fall Recipes you have to try:
Acorn Squash

INGREDIENTS:
1 medium acorn squash, halved and
seeded
1 tablespoon butter
2 tablespoons brown sugar

DIRECTIONS:
1.	Preheat oven to 350 degrees F (175 degrees C).
2.	Turn acorn squash upside down onto a cookie sheet. Bake in a 350 degrees F (175 degrees C) oven until it begins to soften, approximately 30 to 45 minutes.
3.	Remove squash from the oven and turn onto a plate so that the flesh is facing upwards. Place butter and brown sugar into the squash, and place remaining squash over the other piece. Place squash in a baking dish (so the squash won't slide around too much) while baking.
4.	Place squash in the 350 degrees F (175 degrees C) oven and bake another 30 minutes.

This is the only way I've ever had squash but you can do it a quicker way. Cut it in half and seed it. Microwave on high for 5 minutes. Put about a tablespoon of butter in each have and spread it around on the top edges and inside. Litely sprinkle nutmeg all over and then about twice as much cinnamon. Follow it up with brown sugar (1-2T each half depending on how sweet you like it) and bake at 350 for about 20 minutes. Feel free to turn the oven off and keep the squash in there until the rest of your meal is done. You just can't miss with squash this way!

Thanks

=====
int i = 6;
int j;

int *ptr = &i;
int *ptr1 = &j

j = i++;

//now j == 6 and i == 7. Straightforward.
What if you put the operator on the left side of the equals sign?

++ptr = ptr1;
is equivalent to

(ptr = ptr + 1) = ptr1; 
whereas

ptr++ = ptr1;
is equivalent to

ptr = ptr + 1 = ptr1;
The postfix runs a compilation error and I get it. You've got a constant "ptr + 1" on the left side of an assignment operator. Fair enough.

The prefix one compiles and WORKS in C++. Yes, I understand it's messy and you're dealing with unallocated memory, but it works and compiles. In C this does not compile, returning the same error as the postfix "lvalue required as left operand of assignment". This happens no matter how it's written, expanded out with two "=" operators or with the "++ptr" syntax.

What is the difference between how C handles such an assignment and how C++ handles it?

c++ c increment prefix
share|improve this question
edited Sep 5 at 23:06

Andrzej A. Filip
2,5122718	
asked Sep 3 at 22:01

Moe45673
35049
12	 	
As far as I know ++i doesnt return an l-value in C. Regardless, this is UB as you modify the variable 2 times between two consecutive sequence points. In other words its unspecified whether the value is incremented first or it is assigned first.   bolov Sep 3 at 22:04 
3	 	
@juanchopanza the code runes, it is UB so the program goes back in time and stops the compiling process. So yeah   bolov Sep 3 at 22:07
4	 	
@juanchopanza: Perhaps the program goes back in time and interrupts the compilation. Edit: I see bolov had the same idea   Benjamin Lindley Sep 3 at 22:07 
2	 	
The result of assignment is an rvalue in C and an lvalue in C++ (and ++x is nothing more than x += 1).   T.C. Sep 3 at 22:17 
3	 	
@bolov I think ++ptr = ptr1 is not UB in C++ (>= 11). There is a sequenced-before relationship between the side-effect of the prefix ++ and the side-effect of =.   dyp Sep 3 at 22:20