Subject: Your Depriving Your Thyroid

From: Gut-Sickening Health Industry <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 10:07:56 -0800

Legal Action forces Health Industry to Address Public. DEC 2014: Notice #2: Reversal Protocol Enclosed

Weight-Loss Industry issues Retraction.

Don't think you have been lied to?

Just ask yourself this: Which 1 of these Causes Weight-Gain?

A) Exercising 4-5 times per week

B) Counting Calories

C) Drinking 8 OZ of Water daily

>> Answer: ALL of the ABOVE

In response to public backlash,
FatDestroying Protocol has been issued

to remedy years of misguidance.

View Fat-Destroying Protocol ->

[End Notice]

To modify message preferences - notify webmdd--ZN8 Group

2925 Eagles Nest Dr|Bo w i e| MD|20716 or visit here

Does this work when I did a git commit --amend and what I really meant to do is a git commit? , if you accidentally amended, use git reset --soft , where oldref is the commit ID before the amend. You can use git reflog to identify the old commit ID. This will undo the effects of the amend, but leave changes staged. Then just do git commit to the accepted answer is better than this if you're doing something complicated like an interactive add and accidentally did -a, like i did. Still, both answers are you're foolish and don't think carefully you can lose staged changes with this approach. The accepted is more explicit and safer. Kyralessa's answer is a must read and infers a better understanding of what is Does git commit --amend always remove staged changes? If not, when does it? -amend turns the current tree (ie, staged changes) into a commit, overwriting
current HEAD. After that point, they're not considered staged anymore because they're part of the commit (ie, git diff --cached is blank), but don't know why this answer didn't get more votes. It's usually the easiest fix in my opinion. Unless the change is very complicated. It's especially effective when you have gone so far as to send your bad commit to say Gerrit or a remote branch already.