Subject: Re: Are E-Tree requirements addressed in the VPMS requirement

From: Simon Delord <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 10:11:53 +1000

Hi Shane,

Just following up on the previous email.
Did any discussion take place during IETF78 between the l2vpn & pwe3 chairs
and the area-directors
and has any decision been made?

Thanks in advance,

Simon

2010/7/26 Shane Amante <[email-masked]>

> Simon,
>
>  On Jul 26, 2010, at 03:06 GMT+02:00, Simon Delord wrote:
>
> Hi there,
> Taken from Shane's previous email:
> "- Furthermore, the PWE3 WG owns the definition of the Control Word and
> they would have to agree to it's use for filtering /before/ L2VPN could take
> on any work related to E-TREE, particularly if there was a contingency on
> using CW filtering as a solution."
>
> The minutes in the PWE3 WG for IETF77 show that during presentation of
> draft-delord-pwe3-cw-bit-etree-02.txt
> "Matthew: would like to see what L2VPN does first then deal with solutions"
> Does anyone have an idea on how to make progress on this situation ?
>
>
> It seems like the PWE3 & L2VPN co-chairs will have to get together with our
> co-AD's and discuss how to resolve this situation.  I'll report back to the
> list after we've had a proper chance to discuss.
>
> -shane
>
>
>  Cheers,
>
> Simon
>
>
>
>