Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] References to concepts draft in draft-ietf-p2psip-rpr and draft-ietf-p2psip-drr

From: Bruce Lowekamp <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 13:22:56 -0400

On the concepts draft refs, in -base we chose to redefine them in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-p2psip-base-26#section-2 as it
didn't appear concepts was moving forward.  If -base doesn't include
the terminology etc now, may want to simply move the content into the
appropriate document.

Bruce

On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo
<[email-masked]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> both of these drafts (in the publication requested state) have
> informative references to the concepts draft:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-p2psip-rpr-07.txt
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-p2psip-drr-07.txt
>
> Given that both draft state that they use the terminology defined in the
> concepts draft "extensively", shouldn't those references be normative?
> That is, downrefs.
>
> Also, what is the status of the concepts draft?
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-04
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gonzalo
> _______________________________________________
> P2PSIP mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip