Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06

From: Alissa Cooper <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 11:38:03 -0400

Roni, thanks for your review. Stephane, thanks for agreeing to make fixes. I have entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa

> On Sep 27, 2017, at 9:09 AM, [email-masked] wrote:
> 
> Thanks I will fix it in the next revision
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roni Even [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 11:00
> To: [email-masked]
> Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06
> 
> Reviewer: Roni Even
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-??
> Reviewer: Roni Even
> Review Date: 2017-09-27
> IETF LC End Date: 2017-10-04
> IESG Telechat date: 2017-10-12
> 
> Summary:
> The document is ready for publication as a standard track RFC with nits
> 
> Major issues:
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> 1. Abbreviation like RIB and FIB are not expanded 2. In section 9.1 "more simple" should be "simpler"
> 3. In section 9.1 " does not enough provide enough bandwidth"  to " does not provide enough bandwidth" 4. In section 9.2 "a mechanism where the convergence of the  network upon a topology change is made ordered to prevent transient forwarding loops"  is difficult to read maybe "a mechanism where the convergence of the network upon a topology change is ordered in order to prevent transient forwarding loops"
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art