Subject: Re: Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-pic-12

From: Ahmed Bashandy <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 11:04:32 -0800

Thanks for the comments

I will fix the nits shortly

ahmed

On 1/17/21 12:57 PM, Ines Robles via Datatracker wrote:
> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> This document proposes a hierarchical and shared forwarding chain  organization
> that allows traffic to be restored to pre-calculated  alternative equal cost
> primary path or backup path in a time period that does not depend on the number
> of BGP prefixes.
>
> Comment/Question to the authors:
> 1- In the document states: "The proposed technique achieves prefix independent
> convergence while ensuring incremental deployment, complete automation, and
> zero management and provisioning effort." What is the scope involved in zero
> management? It would be nice if the text explains how the technique achieves
> the zero management and the provisioning efforts. 2- "it benefits from all its
> benefits" --> it would be nice to mention some of the benefits in brakets. 3-
> Is this technique not affected by any type of bpg prefix hijacking attack? 4-
> If there is no privacy issues I would states that explicitly.
>
> Thank you for this document,
>
> Ines.
>
>
>