Subject: Re: [Sigtran] M3UA IG05 :Response to ASPIA

From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 04:37:41 -0600

J.Javier,

Well, John L. just removed the '(s)' from SUA based on the discussion
that it was agreed for M3UA.  See John's latest notes...

See Samuel's note "Re: [Sigtran] SUA and - RC in CLDT" from Aug 8
where he says:

On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Samuel Dur D. Jeyaseelan wrote:

>Authors of M3UA and SUA
>
>
> Many a time we have discussed this point none of the documents reflect
> this change, It is good if IG reflects this change.
>
>--Samuel

Read on up back that thread as well.

Please remove the (s) from these passages in M3UA as well and skip
the wildcarding.

--brian

J.Javier Pastor (TS/EEM) wrote:                                                   (Tue, 23 Sep 2003 15:43:01)
> Brian, 
> 
> Could you please refer where that decission was agreed? I didn't find it...
> 
> Thanks // Javier.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]]
> > Sent: martes, 23 de septiembre de 2003 12:34
> > To: [email-masked]
> > Cc: [email-masked]
> > Subject: Re: [Sigtran] M3UA IG05 :Response to ASPIA
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Brian,
> >              It is not there in current IG.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email-masked]> on 09/23/2003 
> > 03:56:25 PM
> > 
> > Please respond to [email-masked]
> > 
> > To:    Kamesh Kaul/HSS@HSS
> > cc:    [email-masked]
> > 
> > Subject:    Re: [Sigtran] M3UA IG05 :Response to ASPIA
> > 
> > 
> > kakaul,
> > 
> > We already agreed to drop the 's' (plural) from Application Server's'
> > in these passages.
> > 
> > --brian
> > 
> > [email-masked] wrote:
> > (Tue, 23 Sep 2003 15:33:15)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >          Referring to section 4.3.4.3 ASP Active Procedures
> > >
> > >    "In the case where an ASP Active message does not 
> > contain a Routing
> > > Context
> > >    parameter, the receiver must know, via configuration data, which
> > >        Application Server(s) the ASP is a member."
> > >
> > >      Referring to section 4.3.4.4 ASP Inactive Procedures
> > >
> > >         "In the case where an ASP Inactive message does not
> > >    contain a Routing Context parameter, the receiver must know, via
> > >    configuration data, which Application Servers the ASP is 
> > a member and
> > >        move the ASP to the ASP-INACTIVE state in all Application
> > Servers."
> > >
> > > These lines imply that if ASPAC/IA messages is received without RC
> > receiver
> > > should activate/inactivate all the application servers 
> > served by ASP.
> > > If that is not implied then some clearification should be 
> > added in IG to
> > > make RC conditional in ASPAC and ASPIA messages aswell to avoid any
> > further
> > > confusions. Current IG does not address this problem
> > >
> > > Kamesh Kaul
> > > www.hssworld.com
> > > Hughes Software Systems
> > 
> > --
> > Brian F. G. Bidulock
> > [email-masked]
> >  http://www.openss7.org/
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sigtran mailing list
> > [email-masked]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
> > 

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email-masked]
http://www.openss7.org/

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran