Subject: Re: [siprec] #36: Do we need REQ-030 on identifying a session as an RS?

From: "siprec issue tracker" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:03:45 -0000

#36: Do we need REQ-030 on identifying a session as an RS?
------------------------------------------------+---------------------------
 Reporter:  john.elwell@…                       |       Owner:  john.elwell@…                     
     Type:  defect                              |      Status:  new                               
 Priority:  minor                               |   Milestone:                                    
Component:  Requirements                        |     Version:                                    
 Severity:  Active WG Document                  |    Keywords:                                    
------------------------------------------------+---------------------------
Changes (by krehor@…):

  * owner:  krehor@… => john.elwell@…

Comment:

 Explicit indication of a recording session is required but not covered by
 REQ-000.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/siprec/trac/ticket/36#comment:1>
siprec <http://tools.ietf.org/siprec/>