Subject: Re: [Terminology] Terminology draft revised

From: Jim Fenton <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 12:02:40 -0700

On 29 Oct 2021, at 7:09, Salz, Rich wrote:

>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-knodel-terminology/07/
>
>>    released 22 October, is still pushing for independent submission.
>
> Actually, it also says "Response to review needed"
>
> If you have comments on it, the place to post them is not this list, but [email-masked]  I did.

Not being particularly familiar with the independent submission process: Is it true that there is no public venue for discussion of this draft (or other independent submission drafts)? The address you point to seems to be that of the ISE, and [email-masked] (mentioned by Mallory in a later message) goes to the authors + ISE.

-Jim